Editorial Board
The editorial board of JUNK comprises distinguished scholars from institutions worldwide, collectively representing every conceivable area of expertise. Their combined knowledge is, in the most literal sense, universal.
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Cornelius Thaddeus Pemberton III
Institute for Advanced Everything, University of Zurich
Omniscience Studies, Meta-Research Methodology
Senior Editors
Deputy Editor
Dr. Minerva Stockworth-Jenkins
Department of Interdisciplinary Interdisciplinarity, MIT
Cross-pollination of Unrelated Fields
Statistical Editor
Prof. Reginald Q. Numbersworth
Centre for Adequate Statistics, University of Oxford
Numbers, Generally
Managing Editor
Ms. Eleanor Whitfield
ISUK Editorial Office, Zurich
Organizational Omnipotence
Associate Editors
Associate Editor, Natural Sciences
Dr. Hypatia Fernandez-Boyle
Laboratory of Surprisingly Useful Experiments, Caltech
Applied Serendipity, Controlled Accidents
Associate Editor, Social Sciences
Prof. Oluwaseun Adebayo-Chen
School of Human Behaviour and Adjacent Phenomena, LSE
Sociology of Everyday Bewilderment
Associate Editor, Humanities
Dr. Alistair Montague-Firth
Faculty of Ancient and Future Languages, University of Bologna
Comparative Obscurity, Hermeneutics of the Obvious
Associate Editor, Engineering
Prof. Ingrid Kvalheim-Sato
Department of Impractical Engineering, Imperial College London
Solutions to Problems That Don't Exist Yet
Associate Editor, Arts & Design
Dr. Caspian Bellweather-Okonkwo
Institute of Aesthetic Uncertainty, Royal College of Art
Visual Epistemology, The Aesthetics of Data
Ethics Editor
Prof. Prudence Fairweather
Centre for Extremely Applied Ethics, University of Cambridge
Ethical Implications of Everything
Reproducibility Editor
Dr. Björn Wiederholsson
Institute for Doing It Again, Karolinska Institutet
Replication Studies, Déjà Vu Research
Emerging Fields Editor
Dr. Priya Krishnamurthy-O'Sullivan
Department of Disciplines That Didn't Exist Last Year, Stanford University
Anticipatory Scholarship, Pre-emptive Peer Review